MyStreamSetup
MyStreamSetup
Webcam testMicrophone testWebcam and mic test
TestsWebcam testMicrophone testWebcam and mic testHeadphone testPre-stream checklist
SetupsSetup builderSetup guidesAudio routingCamera checker
SettingsBitrate calculatorUpload calculatorSettings by platformTwitchYouTube LiveKickFacebook LiveTikTok LIVE
GearAll gearComparisonsStream Deck selector
GuidesChoose your gearConnect and set upFix a problemAll guidesAll tools
AboutCorrections and contact

Search stays on this device. Esc to close.

Comparisons / Webcams / Facecam 4K vs Kiyo V2

Elgato Facecam 4K vs Razer Kiyo V2

Elgato Facecam 4K reaches 4K at 60 fps (MJPEG over USB 3); Razer Kiyo V2 tops out at 4K at 30 fps. Field of view: Elgato Facecam 4K 90 degrees diagonal; Razer Kiyo V2 93 degrees configurable. A wider view shows more of the room behind you.

From each maker’s own specifications; neither model was tested by this site.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. How this site earns · Amazon offers a free 30-day Prime trial, with free delivery on eligible items.

Elgato Facecam 4K

4K, to crop a tighter shot or record.

Check price on Amazon ↗

Razer Kiyo V2

A desk camera with Windows software effects.

Check price on Amazon ↗

On the makers’ own sites:

Before you choose

Elgato Facecam 4K

The catch: Connect it to a USB 3 port to get every video mode, then choose the exact mode in OBS. On USB 2 you get fewer modes, even with a USB-C plug.

You need:

  • A USB 3 port (5 Gbps)

Check first:

  • A USB-C port on your computer

Razer Kiyo V2

The catch: The basic camera works on any supported computer; Razer’s software effects need a supported Windows PC. Test those effects in OBS before the show.

You need:

  • A USB 3 port (5 Gbps)

Check first:

  • A USB-C port on your computer

Everything to check before you buy

Where they differ

SpecsElgato Facecam 4KRazer Kiyo V2
Largest mode4K at 60 fps (MJPEG over USB 3)4K at 30 fps
Elgato Facecam 4K reaches 4K at 60 fps (MJPEG over USB 3); Razer Kiyo V2 tops out at 4K at 30 fps.
Fastest mode4K at 60 fps (MJPEG over USB 3)1080p at 60 fps
For smooth motion, Elgato Facecam 4K runs up to 4K at 60 fps (MJPEG over USB 3) and Razer Kiyo V2 up to 1080p at 60 fps.
Field of view90 degrees diagonal93 degrees configurable
Field of view: Elgato Facecam 4K 90 degrees diagonal; Razer Kiyo V2 93 degrees configurable. A wider view shows more of the room behind you.

Where they are the same

USB port needed
USB 3
Cable in the box
USB-C to USB-C cable
Tripod thread
Yes

Not enough data to compare

We haven’t confirmed a figure for one or both models on: Camera movement, Tracking and framing modes, HDR. The site leaves these out rather than guess.

What else each needs

Elgato Facecam 4K

Facecam 4K
A USB 3 port (5 Gbps)
A USB-C port on your computer
A tripod or arm with a 1/4-inch screw
  • You need: A USB 3 port (5 Gbps). On a USB 2 port it falls back to lower modes. USB-C is a plug shape, not a speed, so check the port itself.
  • Check first: A USB-C port on your computer. The cable in the box has USB-C at both ends. If your computer only has USB-A ports, you need a USB-C to USB-A cable rated for the same speed.
  • Optional: A tripod or arm with a 1/4-inch screw. For a position the monitor mount cannot reach.

Razer Kiyo V2

Kiyo V2
A USB 3 port (5 Gbps)
A USB-C port on your computer
A tripod or arm with a 1/4-inch screw
  • You need: A USB 3 port (5 Gbps). A USB 2 port is too slow for it. USB-C is a plug shape, not a speed, so check the port itself.
  • Check first: A USB-C port on your computer. The cable in the box has USB-C at both ends. If your computer only has USB-A ports, you need a USB-C to USB-A cable rated for the same speed.
  • Optional: A tripod or arm with a 1/4-inch screw. For a position the monitor mount cannot reach.

Next step

Put either model into the setup builder to check it against your computer and the rest of your gear, or see all 25 side by side in Streaming webcams compared. Test your webcam before you go live.

Full profiles: Elgato Facecam 4K and Razer Kiyo V2.

Sources